Even though many pure Go libxcb implementations exist, it is at least as complex and unreadable as libxcb, if not more. Since well known libraries like SDL, qt and gtk uses libxcb, and they somehow understand how to use it, I can only assume these people have read enough code to make sure it's correct enough. Call it wishful thinking. I don't care anymore.
Signed-off-by: Ophestra Umiker <cat@ophivana.moe>
The library is simple and should be easy to port to Go, however correctness matters more in this case and overhead from cgo is negligible for our usage scenario.
Signed-off-by: Ophestra Umiker <cat@ophivana.moe>
Ophestra Umiker